We need a way to compromise with the unpleasant inherent in the human condition and that creates conflict, as we do not be affected in this way. The ways we use to compromise, called defense. This study has been done with the aim of examining and comparison of defense mechanisms and styles, anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), eating disorder, social phobia disorder, and substance abuse. This study consisted of 180 patients (30 patients per group) that were selected by convenience sampling. The instrument used to measure defense mechanisms was Defensive Style Questionnaire with 40 questions, by Andrews, Singh, and Bond (1993). Data were compared with statistical methods of mean comparison, statistical and one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests. Statistical analysis showed that immature defense mechanisms in patients with substance abuse with mean of 26.87 is the most mechanism used and in patients with anxiety, with the mean of 19.23, is the least mechanism. In developed mechanism, patients with eating disorder with the mean of 12.13 are the most and in patients with substance use is the usage with the mean of 6.45. In neurotic mechanisms, patients with social phobia took the most mean of 13.96 and patients with eating disorders took the least mean of 9.24. The present study investigated the importance of defense mechanisms in patients with psychiatric disorders that effected how people’s lives and interpersonal relationships, domains, and problem solving method of people in life. For this reason, defense mechanisms require more attention.
کلید واژگان :defense style, defense mechanisms, depression disorder, anxiety disorders, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), eating disorder, social phobia disorder, substance abuse
ارزش ریالی : 300000 ریال
با پرداخت الکترونیک