چکیده :

International Court of Justice for over six decades of his judicial activity always tried as a linchpin and judicial the United Nations in fact, in global court officials, adopt integrated approach and targeted towards the principle of prohibition legitimate defense. In addition to the inherent complexity of warfare for example, the interpretation of the principles of necessity and the proportion of cases is debatable. Whenever Court its jurisdiction in addressing international disputes or issuing an advisory opinion has obtained if consideration of the use of force and legitimate defense, based on the principles of international law has embarked to delineate positions and determining the content principle and the exception on it, Stances where the environment is relatively certain and without compliance with the principle balance of power and actual inequality of governments, is depicted in order to strengthen the legal system governing the international community. This article tries to by reference to the Refer to judge together and the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in the field of legitimate defense has review the Court decisions To analyze it find answer the role of the International Court of Justice in development of the principle of non-use of force and legitimate defense.

کلید واژگان :

legitimate defense, United Nations, International Court of Justice, Court decisions, Peace and Security



ارزش ریالی : 600000 ریال
دریافت مقاله
با پرداخت الکترونیک