چکیده :

People often seek profit and wealth creation and supremacy attitudes can be considered as a theoretical option. When the two interests may conflict with each other's work falls to the court judgment, in the meantime, unfortunately, there are those who gain the victory in this litigation and conflict of interest and no action (whether legitimate or illegitimate) should not withhold. Whether it is to achieve what is truly right and being rejected or being denied and violated his right to have another. Here, the individual struggles to succeed in this conflict means that the proposed public and not only the feet but his material interests and moral interests of his dignity is falls. One opening for a person to go out of their problems, which are seen facing an entity that sits in judgment, the origins of the court and the adherent seeks a legislative framework that has been developed to fulfill the right of its original owner, ie a legal entity. Fair hearing, one of the fundamental issues of law, justice and human rights are; as justice, rights, and must not act contrary. If it does, injustice, oppression and disregard the civil rights will follow. Justice, the concept of rights, is a close relationship. In truth, justice, the law treats; the injustice, the opposite behavior is according to the importance of law and human rights, this article will examine the misuse of due formalities.

کلید واژگان :

Abuse, Ceremonial Proceedings, Justice, Procedural Fairness, Principles of Justice.



ارزش ریالی : 300000 ریال
دریافت مقاله
با پرداخت الکترونیک