In every careers and fields there are cases that known as risk and places that are categorized in biological risk centers that can be classified into specific classes. In HSE field also there are risk centers that can be indentified and validated separately and specifically. In definition; places and situation that are capable of existing or creating risk or can be a potential source of making risk are named risk centers. Risk centers in hygiene, immunity, and environment are different and have independent and separated identification. According to their extent of operating; these centers are less or more. In this investigation; tried to recording the huge part of biological risk centers in saipa company. For this reason; a research plan was done for 12 months. That the first three months spent for searching on net and theorical investigation. Then, for nine months and with four experts biological risk centers were identify and related data was gathered and listed with software program Excel. The repeated cases were removed. After recognizing the biological risk centers, by operating method of number PJ-01-001 that is adoption of FMEA method, the risk were validated. In this evaluation every points were investigated and categorized into high, medium and low risk according to their occur, level of risk, frequency of occurrence, exposure to risk, control actions and ability of discovering risk. In the last four months, for the cases that categorized in high and medium risk fixing measures and actions were done. Related to un remitting and investigation; the cases that were in accordance with personnel, were noticed and a large number of these cases eliminated (about so percent) and the parts that needed. Instructions and appropriate actions were programmed and now are available for eliminate contradictions. Finally, it was determined since performing and noticing are not done and there is no training for it, it's not expectable that risk centers can be eliminated. According to this assessment, unremitting and continuing this process, in hygiene field, center of biological risk points were recognized and were diminished from 55 to 22 in less than four months. At last consider the fact that the probability of occurring new risks are obvious; continuing the investigation and identification are recommended
کلید واژگان :inspection, the focus of biological risk, health and safety, risk assessment, Saipa CO, corrective action
ارزش ریالی : 300000 ریال
با پرداخت الکترونیک